• Skip to main content

THE MAP NERD

  • Home
  • About
    • About Eric
    • Eric’s Resume
  • What We Do
    • The Real Estate Industry
    • Insights for Home Buyers and Sellers
    • Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
    • Custom Maps & Imagery
    • Personalized Maps & Gifts
  • What is GIS?
    • GIS at a Glance
    • GIS in the Wild
    • Why You Need GIS
  • Blog
  • Contact

716-946-6368

eric@themapnerd.com

GIS in the Wild

So let’s say a big box retailer is expanding. Their previous stores have all been near interstates in relatively rural areas, and typically function as something of a “destination” — the kind of place that is the centerpiece of a day’s errands. Now, this retailer is making its first moves into more densely populated areas; they’ve identified what markets should be targeted based on the demographics and proximity to the existing supply chain.

Within a new city into which they plan to expand, they’ve identified two potential locations:

  • Location #1 is located just north of the population center, close to an interstate highway and very close to a large concentration of their core customer… but, it’s part of a larger development in a very desirable area, so the land is very expensive.
  • Location #2 is west of the population center, and near a major interstate interchange… yet roughly a 40-minute drive from the pocket of core customers to the north. It’s a stand alone piece of land, and is considerably cheaper than Location #1.

Since it’s always easier to default to price, and that’s typically what the retailer does, let’s go ahead and assume that’s what they do here. Even though Location #2 is further from the target customers, people routinely drive up to three hours to the retailer’s other stores, so by their standard data set, a 40-minute drive versus a 15-minute drive isn’t a huge gap. The stores are built to be destinations, after all.

So, Location #2 wins!

The retailer pours money into building a gigantic destination store, as is their typical M.O. The store opens and performs very well for its first year — in fact, it’s one of the top performing stores in the company. Meanwhile, their top competitor sees the success, and opens a store of their own in the same market: they have the same data and a similar institutional experience as our example retailer, so for them, they see a chance to poach some customers and create a healthy competition for the market share.

They, however, choose Location #1, and open a smaller-scale operation than their destination stores. And if you’ve paid attention to the expansion & contraction of major, big-box retailers in the last decade, you might know where this is going from personal experience.

Fast forward one year: the first store opened, at Location #2, is now one of the worst performing stores in the company, with massive overhead because they built a gigantic store to attract people from hundreds of miles.

Meanwhile, the competitor’s store at Location #1 is doing great — one of the top performers.

The competitor at Location #1 successfully out-positioned our retailer because, through GIS consulting and map analytics, they understood that people move through urban areas very differently than they do rural ones — in cities, 40 minutes might as well be two days for all the consumer cares. If you can find it quicker, you’ll take it.

The store at Location #2 not only lost the war, they lost the battle itself. And they lost it before it even began, because they had poor planning, based on poor, improperly researched assumptions.

The competitor won the Location Wars (a new series coming this Fall to Bravo!, we hope) knew they had to pay more money upfront to be properly positioned as close as possible to their core demographics. They created an intervening opportunity for the people most likely to be purchasing the products both stores sold. Sensing their success and a chance for a stranglehold on the market, the Location #1 retailer quickly opens another location just south of the city center — also ~15 minutes away — creating another opportunity for those customers, effectively controlling two thirds of the market and strangling the first-to-market retailer.

Now, we all love a good bedtime story… but, what’s the moral?

Ignoring the geographic realities of your chosen market — especially if it’s just to save on the upfront investment — can and does have disastrous effects on your bottom line, even many years after the initial decision. You can hand your competitors an advantage you should have had.

The Map Nerd is your secret weapon for advertising targeting, site selection, direct mail consulting, and customer mapping: ensuring that your market stays your market.

State 2017 Population State 2017 Population
california 38,982,847 Kentucky 4,424,376
Texas 27,419,612 Oregon 4,025,127
Florida 20,278,447 oklahoma 3,896,251
New York 19,798,228 Connecticut 3,594,478
Illinois 12,854,526 Lowa 3,118,102
pennsylvania 12,790,505 Utah 2,993,941
ohio 11,609,756 Mississippi 2,986,220
Georgia 10,201,635 Arkansas 2,977,944
North Carolina 10,052,564 Kansas 2,903,820
Michigan 9,925,568 Nevada 2,887,725
New jersey 8,960,161 New Mexico 2,084,282
Virginia 8,365,952 Nebraska 1,893,921
Washington 7,169,967 West Virginia 1,836,843
Arizona 6,809,946 Idaho 1,657,375
Massachusetts 6,789,319 New Hampshire 1,331,848
Indiana 6,614,418 Maine 1,330,158
Tennessee 6,597,381 Rhode Island 1,056,138
Missouri 6,075,300 Montana 1,029,862
Maryland 5,996,079 Delaware 943,732
Wisconsin 5,763,217 South Dakota 855,444
Minnesota 5,490,726 North Dakota 745,475
Colorado 5,436,519 District of Columbia 672,391
South Carolina 4,893,444 Vermont 624,636
Alabama 4,850,771 Wyoming 583,200
Louisiana 4,663,461
The Map Nerd Population Map

Contact The Map Nerd

  • Thanks for checking out The Map Nerd! We’d love to be the solution to your geographic problems.
    Send The Map Nerd a message below for a free consultation on how we can help you with all of your mapping, nerdy needs*.
    *While we may be able to help you with a mapping, nerdy need if you’re playing a board game like RISK or Smallworld, there are no guarantees.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

©2023 The Map Nerd // Website by Webstuff